Showing posts with label States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label States. Show all posts

Friday, 21 March 2014

10 States Are Critical to ACA's 6 Million Goal

Click here to enlarge image [+]

Ten states -- seven of them controlled by Republicans -- hold the key to whether the Obama administration succeeds at signing up 6 million people by the deadline of March 31.

Those states -- California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia -- account for nearly 30 million uninsured, almost two-thirds of the nation's 47 million uninsured.

It's like what Willie Sutton said when they asked him why he robbed banks. 'That's where the money is,'" said Jonathan Oberlander, health policy professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "The national figures are really being driven by just a handful of large states."

Reaching 6 million -- the number projected by the Congressional Budget Office earlier this year -- has both practical and political significance. The more enrollees there are, the more likely the exchanges will have enough younger and healthier people to spread insurance risks and hold down premiums in future years, say experts.

And it also gives Democrats potential bragging rights -- or another headache -- heading into the November elections.

Signups have been stronger than average in California, New York, Florida, and North Carolina where there have been vigorous outreach efforts by states and voluntary groups, but have flagged in many other places.

"We are very happy," said Diego Ricon, 51, who signed up with his wife Saturday at Good Samaritan Medical Center in West Palm Beach, Fla., where nearly a dozen patient navigators with laptops filled a conference room and spilled into a hallway.

California, Texas Take Different Tacks

Of the 10 big states, only California and New York have set up state-based insurance marketplaces for people without employer-based coverage. Those two states received millions in additional federal money for marketing and consumer assistance because they built their own exchanges.

California, with nearly 7 million uninsured -- the highest number in the country -- had enrolled 1 million people as of March 17, more than 30% of those eligible for the marketplace plans in that state.

But in Texas, where 6.2 million people are uninsured, almost a quarter of the state's residents, the state declined to participate in the marketplace. As in most Southern states, officials have been openly hostile to the law. Fewer than 10% of those eligible for the plans had enrolled as of March 1, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent program of the foundation.)

While several small states, including Maryland, Oregon, Massachusetts and Hawaii, have faced continuing problems with state-run websites that have hampered enrollment, they will have little effect on whether the CBO's 6 million projection is reached, policy experts say. The CBO had previously predicted that 7 million would enroll in 2014 but scaled that back after October's rocky rollout.

Nationally, about 5 million people had enrolled in Obamacare plans as of March 17, according to a blog post by CMS Administrator Marilyn Tavenner. Millions more had started the application process but not chosen a plan.

Among both large and small states, those with their own insurance exchanges are generally faring better than those relying on the federal marketplace because of the additional funding they received for marketing and consumer assistance.

But enrollment has varied even among the 36 states participating in the federal exchange. For instance, North Carolina has enrolled nearly 19% of those eligible for the marketplaces compared to less than 10% in Texas and Ohio, according to the Kaiser numbers.

The pool of potential enrollees is calculated to include everyone who is uninsured or has individual coverage and has an income above the level to qualify for Medicaid (which varies depending on whether the state is expanding Medicaid).

North Carolina has done comparatively well because it set up a centralized system for residents to schedule appointments for in-person assistance, Oberlander said.

But he added, "We still have a long way to go to cover all the uninsured."

'Negative Environment' Takes Toll

Enrollment efforts in Ohio, with almost 1.5 million uninsured residents, have been hurt by negative comments about the law by Republican politicians, among them, House Speaker John Boehner, whose district is in suburban Cincinnati, said Kathleen Gmeiner, project director for Universal Health Care Action Network of Ohio, an advocacy group.

"That negative environment has taken a toll," she said. "We run into people all the time who say, 'I thought the law had been repealed,' because all they hear is their congressman has voted for the 50th time to repeal the ACA."

Boehner's office declined to comment.

Another factor hurting enrollment is that Ohio state lawmakers imposed restrictions on the groups that received federal funding to help consumers buy coverage in the online marketplaces, including barring participation from any group that got funds from a health plan, such as hospitals and clinics. Children's Hospital Medical Center in Cincinnati was one of two organizations in that state that returned grants and dropped out.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry also placed restrictions on navigators, which advocates and health providers say has hampered enrollment.

Changing a Culture

Sara Rosenbaum, health policy professor at George Washington University, said that enrollment has also varied because insurers have been more active in some states than others. And states in the Midwest and Northeast also have a culture where people are expected to carry insurance, whereas others do not, she said.

Over the next two weeks, Obamacare supporters have hundreds of enrollment events planned in the 10 states, and top administration officials, including the president and first lady, are expected to make more trips to Florida, Texas, and Ohio to talk up enrollment.

State exchange directors, for their part, are trying to put things in perspective.

"This is about changing a culture that for too many low income people is a culture of coping rather than a culture of coverage," said Peter Lee, who runs the California exchange. "And that doesn't change on a dime."

This article, which was produced in collaboration with USA Today and first appeared March 19, 2014, was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit, nonpartisan health policy research and communication organization not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Friday, 15 November 2013

State Net Capitol Journal Legislative Updates: More States Implement Affordable Care Act Health Insurance Reforms

GOVERNORS IN BRIEF: KENTUCKY Gov. Steve Beshear (D) introduced the state's health benefits exchange web site, dubbed "Kynect: Kentucky's Healthcare Connection." Health exchanges are scheduled to begin enrolling members on Oct. 1 (LEXINGTON HERALD).

HEALTH & SCIENCE: COLORADO Gov. John Hickenlooper (D) signs HB 1266, which among several things aligns the state's health insurance laws with the Affordable Care Act and enacts the state's list of essential health benefits insurers must provide with every health policy sold (COLORADO GOVERNOR'S OFFICE).

SNCJ SPOTLIGHT - STATES CAN ONLY WATCH AS CONGRESS TACKLES MAJOR ISSUES THAT IMPACT THEM

Last Wednesday, the Senate endorsed SB 601, the Water Resources Development Act, the first omnibus water infrastructure legislation since 2007. The $12.5 billion bill, dubbed WRDA, would authorize U.S. Army Corps of Engineers flood control and mitigation projects across the country, including many in some of the most flood-threatened areas of the nation. It would also green light critical port improvements, wetlands restoration and coastal storm protection. Co-authored by California Sen. Barbara Boxer (D) and Louisiana Sen. David Vitter (R), it garnered even more bipartisan support than the online tax bill, passing by a 83-14 margin.

But the bill already has a wealth of critics, including environmental groups upset over language that would speed up the environmental review process for those projects, something many contend causes unnecessary delays and added costs in such projects. Some environmentalists say that means cutting corners on environmental reviews. That concern led Boxer and Vitter to insert a 10-year sunset clause on that portion of the bill.

Although the bill was made more Republican-friendly by avoiding any mention of climate change, it does address it by bolstering coastal infrastructure against the impact of extreme storms that scientists say warmer waters and higher sea levels exacerbate. That will likely draw support from insurers and others most concerned with lessening the fiscal hit such storms cause. Overall, the WRDA authorizes $250 million annually for flood restoration and hurricane and storm damage reduction efforts.

Money and longstanding partisan divides are also likely to be a problem. Some Republicans have complained that the bill allows the Obama administration too much power to choose which water facilities receive support. Meanwhile, Democrats contend that Republicans are too spending-averse to give the bill a fair shot.

"The fate in the House of Representatives is unknown because you've got these extremist folks down there that think any kind of spending by the federal government is too much," Florida Rep. Bill Nelson (D) told Orlando news radio station WMFE.

The bill does not yet have a hearing date.

(THE HILL, STATE NET, SACRAMENTO BEE, LOS ANGELES TIMES, BLOOMBERG TELEVISON, NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURE, NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION, WASHINGTON POST, ASSOCIATED PRESS)

- Compiled by RICH EHISEN

SUPER STORM SANDY VICTIMS TAKE ANOTHER FINANCIAL HIT: Thousands of vacation home and business owners in coastal areas of New Jersey slammed by Hurricane Sandy last October are getting hit with big increases in their flood insurance premiums this year.

Richard Bandazian, who owns a vacation home on the Point Pleasant Beach boardwalk that was actually spared the storm's devastation, saw his insurance bill go up 25 percent to $4,700. And he was told it would keep going up by that amount every year until it reached an unspecified "full premium rate."

The reason for the rate spikes is that last year, before Sandy ever appeared on the radar, Congress passed two laws phasing out flood insurance subsidies the federal government began offering in the 1970s to get property owners and towns to join the federal flood insurance program, which is now deeply in debt.

Some members of New Jersey's Congressional delegation are now trying to convince their colleagues to reverse course on the issue to spare those still trying to recover from Sandy.

"It's a triple whammy," said Sen. Bob Menendez (D-New Jersey). "Even as we slowly recover from the worst natural disaster in our state's history, a man-made disaster is looming in the distance, jeopardizing our recovery. Those who cannot afford the higher premiums will be either forced to sell or abandon their homes."

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R), likewise, has appealed to Washington for relief.

"Foisting the additional burden of a flood insurance increase on home and business owners as currently proposed would be financially devastating," he stated in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) and House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio).

But Christie and Menendez face opposition from free-market conservatives and some environmentalists who contend that flood insurance rates should be higher to discourage developers from building in coastal areas.

Bandazian, meanwhile, points out a flaw in one of the arguments behind the insurance subsidy phase-out: that millionaires ought to shoulder more of the burden of insuring their beach houses.

"They're saying only rich people are able to have houses at the Jersey Shore," he said. "I worked a lifetime to get my beach house, and I'm not a rich guy." (NORTHJERSEY.COM)

- Compiled by KORLEY CLARK

The above article is provided by the State Net Capitol Journal. State Net is the nation's leading source of state legislative and regulatory content for all states within the United States. State Net daily monitors every bill in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the United States Congress - as well as every state agency regulation. Virtually all of the information about individual bills and their progress through legislatures is online within 24 hours of public availability.

To subscribe to the Capitol Journal and access archived issue go to the State Net Capitol Journal.

If you are a lexis.com subscriber, you can access State Net Bill Tracking, State Net Full Text of Bills, or State Net Regulatory Text. If you are interested in learning more about State Net, contact us.

For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.


View the original article here